I recently read the document Change the Story: a shared framework for the
primary prevention of violence against women and their children in Australia.
It states:
Australia
has a choice. We can change the story that currently sees a woman murdered
every week by a current or former partner…
Violence
against women and their children is not an inevitable or intractable social
problem…
Although
there is no single cause of violence against women and their children, the
latest international evidence shows there are certain factors that consistently
predict – or drive – higher levels of violence against women. These include
beliefs and behaviours reflecting disrespect for women, low support for gender
equality and adherence to rigid or stereotypical gender roles, relations and
identities…
What
this framework makes clear is that gender inequality is the core of the problem
and it is the heart of the solution.
Discussing this report with some people at
a barbeque the other day, someone floated the idea of shared responsibility.
They suggested that if we witness a man inflicting violence against a woman,
even if it is their intimate partner, and we do nothing to act, then we have to
consider ourselves part of the problem.
In some ways, this seems like a valid idea.
I know that when I was a child and people witnessed my father acting violently
toward me, I interpreted their not stepping in to mean they thought I deserved
to be treated that way. As a reaction to this, throughout my life, I have stepped
in on multiple occasions and told men off for acting like arseholes. But I have
to admit, in doing so, I think I probably put myself in dangerous situations
that I was lucky didn’t turn seriously bad.
Since I have had kids I know there is no
way I would be willing to put them at risk in this way. If they were with me,
the best I could do would be to call the police. And given how stretched they
already are dealing with domestic violence, would that end up being effective?
I also wonder, if I brought to a man’s
attention, whilst he was already in the middle of a violent rage, how wrong he
was, how badly I was judging his behavior, would that make the situation turn
out better for the woman? Might he not be likely to punish her more when he got
home? Would I also be in some way responsible for that?
I am a massive fan of Brene Brown’s work.
(If you don’t know her, start with her Ted talk The Power of Vulnerability. Seriously mind blowing.
https://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_on_vulnerability?language=en) One of the
things Brene’s work as a shame researcher has revealed, is that shame is highly correlated with violence,
aggression and bullying. This is the result of decades of research in the
area. So I think it is safe to say that heaping shame on people who are already
acting violently is unlikely to achieve the outcome we want.
It breaks my heart to read ‘in Australia, at least one woman a week is
killed by a partner or former partner’. It appalls me that ‘intimate partner violence contributes to
more death, disability and illness in women aged 15 to 44 than any other
preventable risk factor.’
Obviously things need to
change. And though I wish we could wave a magic wand and stop the violence now,
I know this not going to happen. This situation has been going on for a long
time. It makes sense that it will take a long time to effect real change upon
it. But since Rosie Batty won the 2015 Australian of the Year, it feels like we
are at last owning up to the problem. That is always the first step.
But there is one more thing
we can all work toward. If, as Change the
Story suggests, inequality is the ‘core
of the problem’ and ‘heart of the
solution,’ as a society we can work together to make it completely
unacceptable to treat women as less than. This means respecting their value on every level, ensuring they have
equal rights, equal pay, and access to services that allow them make
appropriate decisions for themselves and their children.
No comments:
Post a Comment