In a recent radio interview with David Curnow (listen here), he asked what could be
done to help those who have served in the military deal with their
psychological wounds.
My answer strayed onto the way the system makes it very difficult for those who are struggling to seek help.
The way it works is this:
1. If you report you are having psychological issues to the ADF you are often deemed unfit to deploy
2. If you don't deploy there is no place for you in the army
Now when I first heard about number 2, I couldn't believe it was right.
But when I questioned the validity of the statement an army psychologist
confirmed it was true.
I still grapple to understand how this
can be the case. The ADF is a workplace, no? You acquire an injury (this
time it happens to be psychological) at your workplace. Does it not
count as a workplace injury?
According to the framework of the
Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (WIRC Act)
which aims to help injured workers achieve an early return to work,
employers like the ADF should:
– increase the provision of suitable employment to workers who are injured to enable their early return to work
– enhance flexibility in the system and allow for adaptation to the particular needs of disparate work situations
– provide a framework for the effective occupational rehabilitation of injured workers and their early return to work
I just don't see how the ADF is doing this. The headline of a recent article read,
ADF personnel seek PTSD treatment in secrecy to avoid 'career suicide', members say (read here)
It describes how people serving in the ADF are being forced to seek
psychological assistance in secret so their careers aren't ruined. How can this do anything but confirm that the system is not working?
Sure, some people will
recognise they have a problem and pay to see a therapist in their own
time. But others may not. They might be so scared about admitting
anything is wrong that they are unwilling to take this kind of action.
What happens to them? When they return home to their families, what
happens behind those closed doors.
The psychological cost of
being deployed on life-threatening military operations is beyond
imagining for anyone who except those who have been there. The level of trauma
left behind can be so large that it fills, then spills over the top of
an individual, splashing onto the family of that person.
If the
ADF doesn't do more to help, many people's lives will be broken.
Veterans will continue to take their lives. Partners and children will
continue to bear the brunt of the system's failure. Something needs to
change.
Ruth Clare
writing and other things
Monday, 25 April 2016
Sunday, 17 April 2016
The picture, the words
My fellow school captain, Patrick, unearthed this photo of us. It
appeared in the paper when we became captains of our primary school. I
wrote about it in my book from memory, but this is the first time I have
seen the actual photograph in many years.
Here's how I described it in my book...
'What a pretty face you've got, love,' the photographer had told me as he squished me beside the boy captain for our shot in the mayor's office, after our official welcome into our new roles. 'And you must be smart as well, to be captain. Bet the boys love you.' I wanted to believe his words, but the ideas rested on my skin, unable to penetrate.
Here's how I described it in my book...
'What a pretty face you've got, love,' the photographer had told me as he squished me beside the boy captain for our shot in the mayor's office, after our official welcome into our new roles. 'And you must be smart as well, to be captain. Bet the boys love you.' I wanted to believe his words, but the ideas rested on my skin, unable to penetrate.
When the photo
had appeared in the local paper, a big grin lighting my face as I pushed
my badge into the lens for the whole world to see, Mum had smiled and
hugged me. But her eyes had still been puffy from crying and they hadn't
quite met mine. How could good stuff happen to me when she spent ten
hours a day sobbing.
Anyway, thought some people who read my book might be interested to see a photo from that time.
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
The Real Reason Authors Should Be on Social Media, or The Shame of an Audience of Zero at Your Author Talk
I would like to play out a little moment in
time that happened to me recently surrounding a Q & A event for my newly
published, and first ever book, Enemy.
Scene 1
(Location: Bookshop)
Event
Organiser: So how many people do you know are
definitely coming tonight?
Me: Umm… I’m not exactly sure anyone is coming. I kind of used up my
friends for my book launch
Event
Organiser: (Panic stricken look on face) Have you
told people about it on social media?
Me: Yeah
Event
Organiser: I’m sure people will come. It’ll be
great
Fade on my face showing that I am100% sure
she is wrong.
Scene
2
(Home)
Me tweeting and facebooking the event
again, trying to outrun the growing feeling of shame that comes when planning a
party nobody wants to attend. Three responses ping back to me. All friends. All
saying something along the lines of, “I was planning on coming, but something
has come up.”
Holy
Crap.
Scene
3
(Home)
Me: (text to publicist) I just
wanted to let you know that it seems highly unlikely that anyone will be coming
to this talk tonight. Sorry for being such a no-friends loser.
Scene
4
(Home)
Publicist: (on phone) I’ve spoken to the bookshop and Cate [my publisher who
was doing the Q & A with me]. They both know it may be a no-show. If it is,
you can just have a glass of wine and chat with them. You won’t be the first
author this has happened to. It’ll be fine. Try not to worry.
Great.
So now my publisher knows they should never have produced my book and this bookshop
now wishes they had not sacrificed their precious shelf space to stock it. Kill
me now.
Scene
5
(Home)
Another message chimes, this time from
someone I went to high school with who follows my page on facebook but who I
haven’t seen for twenty years.
Friend:
I’m still coming tonight, but don’t know how long I
can stay.
Me: However long you can stay is more than fine. Look forward to seeing
you then.
Brilliant.
Now I have a lone witness to my absolute failure as an author and human being.
Scene
6
Just before event
(Location: Bookshop)
Me: Sorry about this. The only people I knew were coming are now not
coming, except one guy who probably can’t stay very long. It’s all a bit
embarrassing, isn’t it?
Event
organiser: I’m sure it’ll be fine.
Woman
1: Are you Ruth Clare?
Me: Yes… are you… here for the event?
Woman
1: Yes. I found out about it on twitter.
Me: (nearly sobbing with relief) I’m so glad you’re here, I thought no
one would come!
Man
1: Hi. We met on twitter.
Me: We did! I wasn’t sure if you would come!
Man
1: I’m looking forward to it.
Scene
7
(Location: Bookshop.)
A crowd of eight people gather, looking
attentive and friendly.
Cate:
Let me welcome you to this event…
END
***
Now firstly, let me say, I am extremely
grateful to be in the lucky position of having a bookshop host an event for me
at all. May I also say that this particular bookshop did a fantastic job of
promoting my Q & A event in their newsletter, in-store and on social media.
My publisher also got in on the act,
promoting the event to the large number of followers on social media. I have
less than zero complaints that everyone did their absolute best to spread the
word about the event.
Let me also say, that in the few weeks
since my book, Enemy, has been out in
the world it has had some pretty amazing media coverage. I have talked about it
on Conversations with Richard Fidler
(an hour-long radio interview that broadcasts Australia-wide and has a huge podcast
following both here and internationally). It has had a multi-pages excerpt in
one of Australia’s largest circulation newspaper publications, The Good Weekend Magazine, which
subsequently rolled out to regional centres. It has had an amazing review in The Australian, as well as a few more
community radio interviews. It pretty much could not have had a more amazing
amount of exposure.
But let’s look at the reality of the
situation. This is my first book. People don’t really know me. To ask someone
to come to an event like this means asking them to arrange babysitters to put
the kids to bed, or leave the excitement of their after-work drinks, or interrupt
the very lovely eating of takeaway while watching Netflix.
To attend an author talk takes effort and
energy. If people are going to do it, they need to have a good reason why. So
what was that reason? For my event, the reason boiled down to the effort I had
made at connection on social media.
Apart from one person who attended after
reading the excerpt in The Good Weekend,
every single person who came to my event was someone who I either met
exclusively via twitter or facebook, or who was aware of my event because they
followed my posts.
I really had no idea if anyone would come.
I was beyond delighted that they did, but I know that unless I had put myself
out there, the attendance at my event would have been one person. So if you
have been umming and ahhing about whether you want to get involved in social
media, may I suggest that you picture yourself in the position I was in.
Your first book is published. You have the
opportunity of doing more than one event to promote it. Who are you going to
invite? How are they going to know about it? Even if you are with a big
publishing house, you are still one person trying to compete with the lure of binge
watching House of Cards or Nashville.
People are people. When you are starting
out in your career as an author it may be the personal connections you make on-line
and in the real world that save your event from complete disaster.
Let the shame of the no-show override your
shame of being a blowhard. Start making connections now!
Monday, 14 March 2016
Honesty versus loyalty in memoir writing
Last night I had one of the most vivid and
disturbing dreams I have had in years. In it, my father put his hands around my
throat and tried to strangle me. After an initial struggle I managed to
overpower him, wrap my hands around his throat and squeeze the life out of him.
Normally, that would have been quite enough
to be going on with, but, in the way of dreams, I realised that earlier in the
day I had somehow also been responsible for killing my mother. In the dream I
was not overly upset by their deaths, my major concern was over how to dispose
of their bodies without being caught.
Jump to a moment of me chopping up bodies
and putting them in a suitcase (I have recently watched The Jinx, I am hoping I can blame it for this turn of events!). Then
jump to a moment of me shoving the suitcase in the back seat of the car I was
using to drive me to bookstores to promote my newly released memoir.
Now I know people say that hearing other
people’s dreams is about as interesting as watching paint dry, so most likely
there will be very few people still reading at this point, but for those of you
who have persevered, this dream feels like it is a doorway into the deeper
feelings I have about putting my story out in the world.
Writing a memoir is, by its nature, a very
personal experience. I am telling the story not just of my life, but of the
lives of others. I have tried my hardest to do that story justice – to be honest,
transparent and generous. But a lot of the terrain I have covered in my book is
not pretty. And I do wonder how my Mum and Dad would feel to see themselves
represented through my lens.
There’s a saying that goes, “Blood makes
you related, but loyalty makes you family.”
I have thought a lot about this during the
process of writing my book. So what is loyalty? The Oxford Dictionary defines
it as, “giving or showing firm and constant support or allegiance to
a person or institution.”
It also defines the word “betray” to mean, to “expose (one’s
country, a group, or a person) to danger by treacherously giving information to
an enemy.” Or, in another definition, “Be gravely disloyal to.”
Intellectually, I know that in family systems, especially
family systems where abuse is occurring, the concept of loyalty can be
extremely damaging. It can mean that children become secret keepers. That they
see themselves as worthy of abuse rather than asking whether what their parents
are doing is wrong. It can mean that they would rather betray themselves than their
parents. It can also mean that when these “loyal” children develop into adults,
they stay true to the dynamic of their family of origin, which may mean that
their own children may be doomed to live within familiar patterns of abuse.
There can be big downsides to loyalty. But there
are some pretty major upsides as well. For me, the biggest upside is the sense
of belonging. I think one of the reasons writing a memoir is difficult, and is
now giving me nightmares of myself as a callous murderer, is the deep-seated
fear that I am now moments away from being thrown out of my tribe.
There is also the fact that I generally
think of myself a loyal person. If I love you, I will fight for you, defend
you, sing your praises, help you succeed. I am loyal to my Mum, my brother and
sister. I am loyal my husband and kids. I am loyal to my friends.
But I also have a strong need for openness
and honesty. If there is an elephant in the room my brain keeps shouting,
“Elephant! Elephant! Elephant!” so loud that the words often end up trumpeting
out of my mouth.
The people in my life who get me, love that
about me (thank God, because seriously I can’t seem to shut myself up!) But not
everyone is so keen on honesty. Some people think that loyalty means seeing no
evil, hearing no evil, keeping quiet and toeing the line. For those people, loyalty
and honesty are completely at odds.
But for me, they aren’t. I want the people
in my life to speak their truth. I want them to tell me when I step on their
toes or push against a boundary or say something that hurts them. And I want
them to know that though the moment might feel a bit awkward and full-on, and
though it may not always be handled graciously, I will always circle back, reflect
on what they have said and hear them.
In making room in my relationships for both
loyalty and honesty, hopefully it will mean that I have the privilege of truly
knowing the minds and hearts of my nearest and dearest, so I can connect to them
more deeply. That has got to be a good thing.
So maybe I can find a new way to interpret
the dream. Reflecting on my childhood has allowed me to see my parents as
flawed people who were doing the best that they could, rather than merely
objects that failed to fulfil the needs and wants of my childhood. Maybe the
father and mother I murdered was the outdated image I was held of them from the
past. Maybe I needed to chop my parents into pieces so I could put them back
together again in a way that made sense to me. (But don’t tell the dream
police, I’m not sure they would understand.)
What do you think? Is it possible for loyalty
and honesty to exist together? Would you ever write a memoir?
Monday, 29 February 2016
One of my darlings I had to kill
William Faulkner wrote, “In writing you
must kill your darlings.”
So what does that actually mean? It means
that piece of perfect prose or amazing analogy you have spent weeks agonizing
over, the one that elevates your work to a new level but doesn’t fit with the
story you are telling, must go.
It can be hard to say goodbye, but if you
want to write with clarity and strength, rather than meander through a series
of prettily written passages that take the reader nowhere, kill your darlings
you must.
I recently had to do it in my manuscript. I
had discovered an image that not only drew comparisons between my childhood
story and a weapon of war, but that also hit me on a visceral level as a true
representation of how the disintegration of my family felt. It was a shining
beacon of perfection. But there was a problem.
This glowing passage, by its very nature,
had to be written in an adult voice. And my story is written from my child
perspective. So, though I loved it, still think it is a brilliant analogy, you
will only find echoes of it in my book. And I am okay with that, because though
I love clever writing, I love story more.
That doesn’t mean, however, that no one
will ever see the analogy. You can see it right here, right now. How lucky are
you! So here it is, the darling I had to kill.
***
When a bomb goes off, it causes damage in
different ways – rupturing, tearing and piercing.
Firstly, the blast forces highly compressed
air particles to travel faster than the speed of sound, rupturing air-filled
structures like the lung, ear, and gut.
Then, more intense energy in the form of
shockwaves passes through the organs and tissues, disrupting molecules and
tearing at internal structures.
Moving into secondary fragmentation, the
bomb casing and shrapnel is thrown violently outward piercing soft flesh and
releasing more dangerous fragments when it strikes buildings and glass.
Finally, when the vacuum created by the
rapid outward movement of the blast refills itself with the surrounding
atmosphere, it creates a high-intensity wind that causes people, buildings and
fragmented objects to be drawn back in toward the source of the explosion.
I didn’t know it yet, but Dad’s leaving
had thrown a bomb into our family. In a few short days, our lives would be
blown apart. I was about to spend the next six years sifting through wreckage…
I reassured myself that tomorrow Mum would
be back to her old self, standing at the stove cooking chops and veges for
dinner…
It turned out, I was very wrong. The highly
compressed air had already blasted from the bomb. The concrete structure of rules
and schedules that had defined my life with Dad was razed to the ground, and
the mother I had always known was never coming back.
***
So there it is. My darling does live after
all. Have you killed any darlings lately?
Friday, 26 February 2016
Stop comparing. Be kind to your writing self
I read books on story structure, creative writing and memoir. Armed with all of this helpful information, I began the task of getting words down onto a page.
Once I was a ways into my manuscript, I listened
to podcasts like this one and this one, and wrapped my head around the difference between plotters and
pantsers, the merits of a crappy first draft and how best to utilize beta
readers.
When I was nearing a stage of being ready to
show my work to someone, I poured over blog posts on author platforms, the
publishing process and pitching.
In the past few years have managed to write and
edit a manuscript, get an agent, find a publisher, and am now on the cusp of
launching my first book. Some might say that is a reasonable effort.
But during my on-line research, I read (continue
to read!) many accounts of authors finishing their first book, starting
immediately on their next, and continuing a cycle of churning out books at a
dizzying pace. One book a year. Often two. Some people hammering them out in a
few short months! I wanted to be one of those authors.
For most of my life I have pushed myself hard.
Take no prisoners. Cut no slack. I am a doer who gets things done. In my work
as a copywriter, I am the queen of quick turnaround. I gain great satisfaction
from beating deadlines and exceeding expectations.
I planned for it to be the same with writing
books. But I hadn’t counted on the way delving into my emotional world could
sap my drive.
In all my years of writing copy for brochures,
websites, and business plans, I can’t say I have ever shed a tear. The same cannot
be said of writing a memoir covering such light-weight terrain as my deepest
childhood wounds and the trauma of war. (There are funny, happy bits as well –
promise!)
Still, despite the fact that some days I felt so
drained I could barely put one foot in front of the other, I tried to stick to
my guns. I was determined to have the first draft of my next book, a young
adult fiction, completed by the time Enemy
hit the shelves.
With that goal set, as soon as my memoir
manuscript was with my editor, I started in. I began churning out words and
managed to get about a quarter of the way into the draft. Then the edits came
back, and I had to rake back over that old ground. Each time I re-worked a
section I re-lived the experience on which it was based, feeling those old
feelings so I could distil them into the purest emotional truth I knew.
By this time, I had started to feel tired. Deep
down to my bones tired.
But I have never been one to let the mundane
fact that I am human stop me from pushing myself like a machine. So when I
finished that next editing process, I jumped straight back to my other
manuscript.
But I could feel my blood running thin, like my
foot was on the accelerator but there was nothing in the tank. Finally, after finding
myself wide awake night after night with stress pulsing in my gut, and hacking
up a lung each day for three months from a cold I couldn’t shake, I began to
question what the hell I was trying to prove. And to whom.
I think part of my motivation was fear. I felt
so lucky to have had a book accepted for publication that I wanted to prove –
to myself, to my agent, to my publishers – that their faith in me was not
misplaced. Another reason I wanted it done was because I had heard that writing
a second book was harder than writing a first, and I wanted to see if I could
do it. There was also the fact that before someone suggested I should give
fiction a go, it had never occurred to me. And I was really excited by the
idea.
But though I still think about my YA book all
the time, I have had to face up to the fact that I am not going to be one of
those quick turnaround authors. My first book is hitting the shelves in three days
time, and my second manuscript is not finished. And you know what, I am okay
with that. More than okay.
I am a first-time author. I am still figuring out
what my writing process actually is. So I am taking the pressure off. I am not
going to fall into the comparison trap. I am practicing being kind to myself,
instead of always expecting more.
Besides, I have written a book. An actual
factual book that people can buy from bookshops. That is a peak life experience
right there. I need to spend the next few months mooning about the place with a
big smile on my face, letting the wonderful delightfulness of it all sink in.
Then, once my feet touch the ground again, I am
going to get back into my YA. Not to prove anything to the imaginary critics in
my head. But because the guy in it is so hot. And my lead character is so
funny. And I need to figure out what happens between her and her mother. And
what goes down between her Mum and her aunt…
Now that I have had a taste of writing books, I
am hooked. I want to do it for a long time. That means protecting myself
against burnout, and choosing the carrot over the stick. No more comparisons. Just me with a laptop having fun with my imaginary friends.
Each person's creative process is as unique as the work they produce. How do you approach your writing?
Thursday, 28 January 2016
How to narrow the focus of your memoir
One of the main issues I have found with
memoir writing is not lack of material, but rather too much. Each day has
moments worthy of notice and attention. If you add a lifetime of days together,
that is a ridiculously overwhelming volume of material to work with.
Another problem is, that although there are
moments from your life that are incredibly important to you on an individual level,
they may not be at all important to your memoir on a story level. So how do you
narrow your focus?
I heard a piece of advice (from a podcast I
listened to years ago and I can no longer find- doh!) that helped me enormously
in this process. The wise person said that she saw memoir as a piece of
non-fiction writing where you are making an argument for something, and your
life story is merely an illustration of the point you are trying to make. The
example she gave was that someone could write a memoir making the argument,
‘Life is better when you share it with a cat.’ You would then go on to draw
examples from your own life that demonstrated this.
I love the way this concept stops your
memoir merely being about you as an individual and broadens it into something
larger and richer. When I took her idea and applied it to my own book, it took
me months of driving myself bananas to come up with something that I thought
really captured what I was trying to communicate. I decided the ‘argument’ of
my book was: ‘If we don’t look after veterans, it is not just them, but their
families, who pay the price.’
This was a very effective way to separate
out the stories that needed to be included in my book from the ones that
didn’t. That’s not to say it was easy. Some of the stories I left on the curb
were favourites of mine. ‘Killing your darlings’ takes on a whole new meaning
when the story you are abandoning is very personal and intensely meaningful…
but it is necessary.
A memoir is not a journal. It is something
you are writing for an audience. If you can’t make tough decisions about what
belongs and what doesn’t, you will never create the clarity necessary to
transform a bunch of stories into a book.
What about you? What techniques have you
found helpful to help narrow the focus of your memoir?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)